Apple will eventually support it, but to expect them to support every single 1% (or less) use case with their very first product release is nuts. (Calling port 1 the furthest to the outside of the case, and port 4 the one closest to the mid-line of the machine, next to the miniDisplayPort. I'd be willing to bet that a setup with more than one external monitor falls into the less than 1% category. On at 12:29 PM, Superdad said: Yes, on the Mac mini (2012 for sure), ports 1 and 3 give markedly better SQ than ports 2 and 4. So saying that not running a third display is akin to not supporting a BT mouse/keyboard is ridiculous.
If you count the display it already has, then it does support a second one. Where are you getting that the MBP doesn't support a second display?Įnabling the Mac Mini to drive two monitors, and the MacBooks to handle one external screen alongside the built-in display Not really sure what they were thinking in that regard. It would be like saying it doesn’t support a Bluetooth keyboard or a different mouse other than the trackpad. PC or Mac to a 4K HDMI, Single Link DVI, or VGA video Monoprice Mini. I can buy cheap ass PCs for a couple of hundred dollars that support a second display. just the USB C port Macs do support daisy-chaining DisplayPort screens (they. Frankly, I’m shocked that Apple released a device they called a “pro” device that does not natively support a second display.
But, does it allow you to add a second display to a MacBook Pro? Well then yes, it’s probably worth it. The mini display port that sits in most Macbook, iMac, mac mini and mac pro is of the old Mini Display port 1.1, this only supports up to resolutions of. Well I don’t think that was really the point, nobody’s going to run six displays in real life.
0 kommentar(er)
